Did you know that our school board is required to go through the redistricting process after the U.S. Census is completed?
This routine practice occurs every ten years to ensure that our school district accurately reflects the changing demographics of our community. The redistricting process involves reviewing and adjusting the boundaries of voting districts to maintain fairness and equal representation. It's like taking a fresh look at the map to make sure everyone's voice counts, and no area is left underrepresented or overrepresented.
We encourage you to stay informed and participate in the process to help shape the future of our educational governance system. Your input is valuable, and together we can contribute to a more equitable and responsive school district.
See the frequently asked questions below for additional information.
What is redistricting?
According to the Texas comptroller website, “redistricting is the process of redrawing district boundaries to guarantee equal voter representation through equal, or equivalent, population counts.”
Click here to read "Redistricting 101" on the Texas Comptroller website for more information.
Why are Texas school districts required to redistrict?
Texas Education Code sections 11.052 and 11.053 require that school districts redivide single-member districts if the most populous single-member district exceeds the population of the least populous district by more than 10%.
Texas school boards, like many other electoral entities, redistrict every ten years following the census for a couple of crucial reasons. Firstly, redistricting ensures that electoral districts accurately reflect changes in population distribution. The census provides updated demographic data, allowing for a more equitable distribution of representation based on the principle of one person, one vote.
Secondly, redistricting helps address any potential manipulation of district boundaries to favor a particular party or group. By revisiting and adjusting these boundaries regularly, school boards aim to maintain fairness and prevent any undue concentration or dilution of voting power.
In simpler language…
Every ten years, the board of trustees in Texas school districts are required to use the U.S. Census data to look at where everyone lives and ensure that each area still has a fair number of people. If some places became more crowded or other areas lost residents, the lines need to be redrawn on the district map so that each area still has a fair say in how things are run. It's like making sure everyone's opinions count and things stay fair for everyone.
What data is used in order to determine whether districts are balanced?
The U.S. Census data is used to determine whether single-member districts are balanced.
What is U.S. Census data?
Every 10 years the U.S. Census Bureau conducts a national campaign to count every resident in the United States. The data collected provides information about our nation’s people and economy. The most recent census was in 2020.
What census will be used for the 2023 redistricting process?
This redistricting process is based on the 2020 census.
Will redistricting impact the RISD school attendance zone?
Redistricting will not change the outermost boundary of RISD. All RISD households will remain within RISD. Redistricting does not impact school attendance zones in any way.
Can the district choose to leave our existing districts exactly as they are now?
No, redistricting for RISD is not a choice. It is a requirement based on population changes in the 2020 U.S. Census data.
Current School Board Districts
All Population Data with Demographics
DRAFT A Proposals
7 Single-Member Districts
In draft A and draft A_1 updated, the entire school attendance zone is divided into 7 single-member districts. The district lines on this draft were redrawn in order to ensure equity in voter populations based on 2020 Census data. Candidates for the RISD Board of Trustees must run for a position within a single district. Therefore, all 7 positions on the RISD Board of Trustees would require candidates to run for a board position within a specific district and only the people living within that district would be able to vote for their representative on the RISD Board of Trustees.
Draft A- Total Population Data Table with Demographics
Draft A_1 Updated- Total Population Data Table with Demographics
DRAFT B Proposal (4-3)
4 Single Member Districts & 3 At Large Board Positions
In this draft, the entire school attendance zone is divided into 4 single-member districts. The lines on this draft were drawn to divide the RISD school attendance zone into 4 districts in order to ensure equity in voter populations based on 2020 Census data. Therefore, 4 positions on the RISD Board of Trustees would require candidates to run for a board position within a single-member district and would also be voted on as single-member districts with only the people living within that district able to vote for their representative. The other 3 positions on the RISD Board of Trustees would allow candidates to run at large and all RISD voters would be able to vote for representatives in these positions.
Draft B- Total Population Data Table with Demographics
Side-by-Side Inset Map Comparisons:
Draft A, Draft B, & Draft A_1 Updated
Side-by-Side Full Map Comparisons:
Draft A, Draft B, & Draft A_1 Updated
Notable Advantages and/or Disadvantages
Dividing a small population of less than 1000 into 7 single-member districts can pose a significant disadvantage. Each district has a very limited number of residents, potentially leading to challenges in ensuring diverse and effective representation. Additionally, with such small districts, individuals who are willing and capable of taking on leadership roles may be scarce, potentially limiting the pool of qualified candidates for public office. This could hinder the overall democratic process within the community. In other words, the disadvantage lies in the potential for diluted representation and limited choices for the residents in each district.
Dividing a small population of less than 1000 into 7 single-member districts could have potential advantages. Elected officials may work to more closely connect with the specific needs and concerns of their small district. With smaller districts, residents may find it easier to engage with their representatives.
The combination of single-member and at-large districts might initially introduce confusion among voters in terms of elections. Candidates running in single-member districts would only need to campaign in a small area, but candidates running for an at-large position would need to campaign within the entire district. This could be viewed by some as a disadvantage of an at large position.
This hybrid approach aims to combine the strengths of both localized and community-wide representation. This balance can lead to more comprehensive and effective governance in a small population.
Integrating at-large members provides an additional layer of representation on the board and bring in individuals who must consider and represent the broader interests of the entire community. With a small population, having a portion of the board elected at-large can contribute to a more diverse and well-rounded leadership team.